Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Browse by Decade



Amazon Fun

« Nuclear War Revisited (2006) | Main | The Road Ahead: Future of Police Work (1995) »

Is Futurism Dead? (New York Times, 1982)

As a follow-up to yesterday's post about the postmodern paleo-future here's an excerpt from the March 14, 1982 New York Times article, "Now and Then, Congress Also Ponders the Future."

....activity in the field [of futurism] has slowed to the point of stopping. "Actually, [futurism] died somewhere in the 1970's," said Michael Marien, the editor of "Futures Survey," a monthly abstract published by the World Future Society. "Nobody announced its death, but it happened." Mr. Marien, who has been monitoring futures literature for the past dozen years, said the flood of books on trends and forecasts is down to a trickle.

If you have a TimeSelect subscription you can read the entire article here.

See also:
Postmodern Paleo-Future

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (6)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (3)

You maybe already mentionned it but I couldn't find it in your archives: (how the 2004 home computer was imagined in the fifties).

March 30, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterPhilippe

Thanks for the link, but that was actually a hoax.

March 30, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMatt

Damned, shame on me!

March 30, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterphilippe

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>